Back to search

Article

Nature for whom? How type of beneficiary influences the effectiveness of conservation outreach messages

2018-12-01

Abstract excerpt

In recent years the conservation community has engaged in debate over value in nonhuman nature, especially as it relates to motivations for conservation. Many have expressed the assumption that more people are willing to support conservation when emphasis is placed on the human benefits of nonhuman nature, rather than the value of nonhuman nature for its own sake. To test this assumption, we designed an online sur...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
a1319469-d60b-5b25-a24c-599ef6120172
DOI
10.1016/j.biocon.2018.10.029
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Nature for whom? How type of beneficiary influences the effectiveness of conservation outreach messagesDOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2018.10.029
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.