Back to search

Article

Does charging for corrections in the bioscience literature disincentivize pre-publication handling of problematic image data? An ImageTwin-AI study

2026-01-28

Abstract excerpt

The Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) recommends that publishers do not charge for corrections to published papers. Until late 2024 the Journal of Cancer levied a charge on authors (50% of the original article processing charge, APC) for publication of a correction. Herein, it was hypothesized this could disincentivize the discovery and removal of problematic data prior to publication, since post-publication...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
320179dc-280e-5f64-9bc7-e83ae1b782b3
DOI
10.64898/2026.01.16.700000
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Does charging for corrections in the bioscience literature disincentivize pre-publication handling of problematic image data? An ImageTwin-AI studyDOI 10.64898/2026.01.16.700000
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.