Back to search

Article

Diagnosing event dependence in computer-generated-content retraction metadata, 2010–2025

2026-08-20

Abstract excerpt

<title>Abstract</title> <p> Retraction counts are outcomes of detection, classification, and editorial action as well as records of unreliable publications. This study develops an event-dependence diagnostic for annual reason-tag counts and applies it to computer-aided or computer-generated-content (CGC) metadata. A frozen Retraction Watch/Crossref snapshot was restricted to 60,893 retractions dated 2010–2025; 9...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
1047a268-746a-5be6-ba59-a765c68daaa1
DOI
10.21203/rs.3.rs-10458624/v1
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Diagnosing event dependence in computer-generated-content retraction metadata, 2010–2025DOI 10.21203/rs.3.rs-10458624/v1
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.