Back to search

Article

Algorithmic Versus Expert Rankings of Large Language Models in Peritoneal Dialysis Prescription Review: A Trap-Embedded Synthetic Benchmark

2026-06-01

Abstract excerpt

<h4>Background</h4> Clinical LLM benchmarks rarely test whether algorithmic rankings agree with expert clinical judgment. We developed a trap-embedded peritoneal dialysis (PD) benchmark comparing multiple scoring constructs with blinded nephrologist ratings. <h4>Methods</h4> We generated 125 synthetic PD cases containing 13 ISPD-aligned trap types. Five LLMs (Claude Sonnet 4.5, GPT-5.4, Gemini 3.1 Pro, DeepSeek-...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
31ccea61-f464-5ea2-b984-f78650079f97
DOI
10.64898/2026.05.28.26354383
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Algorithmic Versus Expert Rankings of Large Language Models in Peritoneal Dialysis Prescription Review: A Trap-Embedded Synthetic BenchmarkDOI 10.64898/2026.05.28.26354383
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.