Back to search

Article

JARVIS, should this study be selected for full-text screening? Performance of a Joint AI-ReViewer Interactive Screening tool for systematic reviews

2026-04-09

Abstract excerpt

<h4>Background</h4> Systematic reviews are essential for evidence-based decision making in health sciences but require substantial time and resource for manual processes, particularly title and abstract screening. Recent advances in machine learning and large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated promise in accelerating screening with high recall but are often limited by modest gains in efficiency, mostly due...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
2f42d034-c042-5a8a-98f3-f888b55c01f2
DOI
10.64898/2026.04.08.26350384
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
JARVIS, should this study be selected for full-text screening? Performance of a Joint AI-ReViewer Interactive Screening tool for systematic reviewsDOI 10.64898/2026.04.08.26350384
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.