Back to search

Article

Multi-method appraisal of clinical quality indicators for the Emergency Medical Services in the Low- and Middle-Income Setting: The South African Perspective

2020-01-14

Abstract excerpt

<h4>Background: </h4> Quality Indicator (QI) appraisal protocols are a novel methodology that combine multiple appraisal methods in order to comprehensively assess the “appropriateness” of QIs for a particular healthcare setting. However, they remain inadequately explored compared to the single appraisal method approach. The aim of this paper was to describe and test a QI appraisal protocol versus the single metho...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
2b65ad26-2e0f-5330-bd71-3bc3b0420723
DOI
10.21203/rs.2.20860/v1
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Multi-method appraisal of clinical quality indicators for the Emergency Medical Services in the Low- and Middle-Income Setting: The South African PerspectiveDOI 10.21203/rs.2.20860/v1
Acceptability of Australian prehospital care quality indicators: an explanatory sequential mixed methods studySemantic proximity
Validation of a modified South African triage scale in a high-resource setting: a retrospective cohort studySemantic proximity
The Multiple Stakeholder Approach to Real-world Evidence Generation: the Results of the Jandhyala Method in Observing Expert Consensus on Quality Indicators of Rare Disease Patient Registries (RDRs) by Stakeholder GroupSemantic proximity
Protocol for a Multicentre Mixed-Methods Observational Cohort Study Investigating Early Sepsis Management in Ghanaian Emergency Departments and Intensive Care UnitsSemantic proximity
Which outcomes should be included in a core outcome set for capturing and measuring doctor well-being? A Delphi studySemantic proximity
Improving Prioritisation Processes for Clinical Practice Guidelines: New Methods and an Evaluation From the National Heart Foundation of Australia.Semantic proximity
Systematic Pyramid Reviews – A new method of evidence synthesis from different research approaches for routine health care decision making and practiceSemantic proximity
Development, validation, and usage of metrics to evaluate the quality of clinical research hypothesesSemantic proximity
An Interrater Reliability Study on the Gothenburg Obstetric Triage System- a New Obstetric Triage SystemSemantic proximity
A Protocol Describing A Scoping Review to Characterise ICU Admission CriteriaSemantic proximity
Quality improvement in emergency units in low resource settings: A qualitative assessment for understanding challenges and delivering solutionsSemantic proximity
Development and testing of a composite index to monitor the continuum of maternal health service delivery at provincial and district level in South AfricaSemantic proximity
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.