Back to search

Article

Conduction System versus Biventricular Pacing in Pacing-Induced Cardiomyopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2026-07-15

Abstract excerpt

<title>Abstract</title> <p> <italic> <bold>Purpose.</bold> </italic> Pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM) develops in 6–25% of patients with chronic right ventricular pacing. Biventricular pacing (BVP) is the standard rescue strategy, but conduction system pacing (CSP) has emerged as a more physiological alternative. No randomized trial or prior meta-analysis has directly compared the two in established PICM;...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
21cb757d-b96e-57d3-bc53-9ddb8bda93f9
DOI
10.21203/rs.3.rs-10348127/v1
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Conduction System versus Biventricular Pacing in Pacing-Induced Cardiomyopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisDOI 10.21203/rs.3.rs-10348127/v1
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.