Back to search

Article

Falsification Testing of Sepsis Prediction Models: Evaluating Independent Biological Signal After Controlling for Care-Process Intensity

2026-03-18

Abstract excerpt

<h4>Background</h4> Automated sepsis early-warning systems have attracted substantial research investment, yet a fundamental question remains unresolved: do these models detect independent biological signals, or do they predominantly learn care-process intensity — the pattern of clinician ordering behavior applied to patients already suspected of being ill? We report a pre-registered falsification study testing t...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
1bddc278-fcda-564b-ba98-1f301a8e13a2
DOI
10.64898/2026.03.17.26348414
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Falsification Testing of Sepsis Prediction Models: Evaluating Independent Biological Signal After Controlling for Care-Process IntensityDOI 10.64898/2026.03.17.26348414
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.