Back to search

Article

Can grant evaluation still distinguish scientific excellence?

2026-08-05

Abstract excerpt

<p>Grant peer review increasingly depends on fine-grained numerical scores to rank many formally excellent proposals. In the era of generative and agentic AI, this architecture may be losing resolution. We analyse score-distribution data from EU Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA) Postdoctoral Fellowships and show sharp compression of evaluation scores in the 2025 call. Compared to 2024, there was a 64.6% increa...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
19638aac-4f4c-552b-a240-12574823b2db
DOI
10.31222/osf.io/d8gcu_v2
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Can grant evaluation still distinguish scientific excellence?DOI 10.31222/osf.io/d8gcu_v2
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.