Back to search

Article

Which Organism is More Suitable As A Toxic Metal Accumulation Bioindicator – Fishes Or Diatoms: A Case Study Of An A Class Wetland In Northwest Türkiye Under Effect Of An Intensive Paddy Cultivation Stress?

2022-03-22

Abstract excerpt

<title>Abstract</title> <p>In this research, “diatoms” as the first step and “fishes” as the last step of the food chain were compared as the toxic metal accumulation bioindicator in an A Class wetland in Turkey. Toxicant bioaccumulations were determined in liver, gill and muscle tissues of 2 commercially consumed fish species "<italic>Carassius gibelio</italic>" and "<italic>Cyyprinus carpio</italic>" and in fru...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
0f3cf02d-220c-590a-8201-397348d10950
DOI
10.21203/rs.3.rs-1407701/v1
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Which Organism is More Suitable As A Toxic Metal Accumulation Bioindicator – Fishes Or Diatoms: A Case Study Of An A Class Wetland In Northwest Türkiye Under Effect Of An Intensive Paddy Cultivation Stress?DOI 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1407701/v1
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.