Back to search

Article

Can co-designed educational interventions help consumers think critically about asking ChatGPT health questions? Results from a randomised-controlled trial

2025-04-29

Abstract excerpt

<h4>Background</h4> Generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools have clear potential health benefits for individuals (e.g. simplifying information) and risks (e.g. inaccurate information). <h4>Objective</h4> To evaluate two brief co-designed health literacy interventions to help people critically reflect on health questions they ask ChatGPT. <h4>Design</h4> Three arm parallel-group randomised controlled trial <h...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
090dcb5e-8339-5214-97ed-8497abb055fa
DOI
10.1101/2025.04.28.25326600
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Can co-designed educational interventions help consumers think critically about asking ChatGPT health questions? Results from a randomised-controlled trialDOI 10.1101/2025.04.28.25326600
A double-blind, crossover, non-inferiority randomized controlled trial where primary care providers and patients compare human- and AI-generated digital health messages: the AI-CARE study protocolSemantic proximity
Curiosity, reassurance and convenience: Understanding public motivations for using Generative AI in symptom assessmentSemantic proximity
Awareness, Use, and Perceived Accuracy of Generative AI Tools Among Antenatal Patients in NigeriaSemantic proximity
Generative Artificial Intelligence for Clinical Communication: Implications for Non-Pharmacological Interventions in Health CareSemantic proximity
ChatGPT Influence on Medical Decision-Making, Bias, and Equity: A Randomized Study of Clinicians Evaluating Clinical VignettesSemantic proximity
Generative Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare Education: Challenges and Ethical IssuesSemantic proximity
Perceptions, acceptance and educational use of generative artificial intelligence among health professions students and educators: a rapid systematic reviewSemantic proximity
The Scope and Limitations of Extant Research into ChatGPT as a Tool for Patient Education: Systematic ReviewSemantic proximity
“Assessing ChatGPT's Performance in Answering Cervical Cancer Screening Questions to ChatGPT-generated Clinical Vignettes: A Pilot Study”Semantic proximity
Attitudes and Perceptions of Generative Artificial Intelligence Chatbots in the Scientific Process of Traditional, Complementary, and Integrative Medicine Research: A Large-Scale, International Cross-Sectional SurveySemantic proximity
Evaluating Evidence-Based Communication through Generative AI using a Cross-Sectional Study with Laypeople Seeking Screening InformationSemantic proximity
User evaluations of AI- and human-generated responses in digital health communication: A paired survey studySemantic proximity
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.