Back to search

Article

Protocol for a mixed methods process evaluation for a randomised controlled trial to improve shared decision-making about, and uptake of, osteoporosis medicines: the iFraP study

2026-04-02

Abstract excerpt

Background High quality shared decision-making (SDM) conversations involve people with or at risk of osteoporosis and clinicians working together to decide, where appropriate, which evidence-based medicines best fit the person’s life, beliefs, and values. The i mproving uptake of Fra cture P revention drug treatments (iFraP) intervention comprises a computerised Decision Support Tool (DST), clinician training p...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
02ba7dfc-f31a-52fe-a3e5-68c4fdba610d
DOI
10.3310/nihropenres.13751.3
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Protocol for a mixed methods process evaluation for a randomised controlled trial to improve shared decision-making about, and uptake of, osteoporosis medicines: the iFraP studyDOI 10.3310/nihropenres.13751.3
Protocol for a mixed methods process evaluation for a randomised controlled trial to improve shared decision-making about, and uptake of, osteoporosis medicines: the iFraP studySemantic proximity
Protocol Refinement for a Diabetes Pragmatic Trial using the PRECIS-2 FrameworkSemantic proximity
Utility of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research for the patient perspective; comparison of the framework with a thematic analysisSemantic proximity
Qualitative research to inform hypothesis testing for fidelity-based sub-group analysis in clinical trials: Lessons learnt from the process evaluation of a multifaceted podiatry intervention for falls preventionSemantic proximity
Exploring the implementation and integration of structured medication reviews in primary care: A qualitative evaluation using normalization process theorySemantic proximity
Implementation of Evidence-Based Medicine in Primary Care Through the Use of Encounter Shared Decision Making Tools: The ShareEBM Pragmatic TrialSemantic proximity
Utility of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research for the patient perspective; comparison of the original and updated versions of the framework and a thematic analysisSemantic proximity
Protocol for the development of a core outcome set for the evaluation of shared decision-making interventions in healthcareSemantic proximity
Shared decision-making interventions in the choice of antipsychotic prescription in people living with psychosis (SHAPE): protocol for a realist reviewSemantic proximity
Advanced Practice Physiotherapists succeed in Shared Decision-making: A Mixed-Methods Study of 5123 Patients with Musculoskeletal PainSemantic proximity
CASCADE: A Community-Engaged Action Model for Generating Rapid, Patient-Engaged Decisions in Clinical ResearchSemantic proximity
Process evaluation of the SPPiRE trial: a GP delivered medication review of polypharmacy, deprescribing and patient priorities in older people with multimorbiditySemantic proximity
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.