Back to search

Article

Qualitative research to inform hypothesis testing for fidelity-based sub-group analysis in clinical trials: Lessons learnt from the process evaluation of a multifaceted podiatry intervention for falls prevention

2019-06-11

Abstract excerpt

<title>Abstract</title> <p>Background Ensuring fidelity to complex interventions is a challenge when conducting pragmatic randomised controlled trials. We explore fidelity through a qualitative process evaluation, which was conducted alongside a pragmatic, multi-centred, two-arm cohort randomised controlled trial – the REFORM (Reducing Falls with Orthoses and a Multifaceted podiatry intervention) trial. The pape...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
998cfad2-108d-507b-8aa8-0b4becddb513
DOI
10.21203/rs.2.10215/v1
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Qualitative research to inform hypothesis testing for fidelity-based sub-group analysis in clinical trials: Lessons learnt from the process evaluation of a multifaceted podiatry intervention for falls preventionDOI 10.21203/rs.2.10215/v1
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.