Back to search

Article

Naive Defect-Recidivism Mining Is Inflated by Agent Workflow Artefacts: A Construct-Validity Study at Corpus Scale

2026-08-18

Abstract excerpt

<title>Abstract</title> <p> <bold>Context</bold> . Mining version-control history for recidivism signals is a tempting shortcut for comparing AI-agent and human fix durability. <bold>Objective</bold> . We test whether such signals validly measure genuine defect recurrence. <bold>Method</bold> . We define Defect Resolution Debt (DRD) from timestamped Git/GitHub events and apply it to a 3,040-defect mined cor...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
00fbd26d-ec61-511f-95be-2ca0c40658d8
DOI
10.21203/rs.3.rs-10720104/v1
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Naive Defect-Recidivism Mining Is Inflated by Agent Workflow Artefacts: A Construct-Validity Study at Corpus ScaleDOI 10.21203/rs.3.rs-10720104/v1
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.