A comparative study of the growth, yield, and physiological responses of arbosana, arbequina, coratina, and maraqi olive cultivars.

doi:10.1038/s41598-026-57940-1

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Community

Back to search

Article

A comparative study of the growth, yield, and physiological responses of arbosana, arbequina, coratina, and maraqi olive cultivars.

Scientific reports - 28 Jul 2026

Hamdy Ashraf E, Mekky Alsayed E, Elnaggar Ibrahim A, Abdel-Aziz Hosny F, El-Shennawy Sahar I, Mustafa Eman N, El-Wahed Abd El-Wahed N Abd

Abstract excerpt

Expanding olive cultivation into newly reclaimed sandy soils faces challenges from salinity, low fertility, and limited water-holding capacity. Success depends critically on cultivar selection, yet comparative information remains limited. This study evaluated four olive cultivars ('Arbosana', 'Arbequina', 'Coratina', 'Maraqi') in Egypt's Wadi Al-Natrun region over two seasons (2024-2025) using a randomized...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Egypt
Share to Fruit
Share to Genotype
Share to Olea

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Proline

Share to Stress, Physiological

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 42521700
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-026-57940-1
PMCID: PMC13415808

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships.