Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Genotyping both live and dead animals to improve post-weaning survival of pigs in breeding programs.

Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE - 18 Sept 2024

Sharif-Islam Md, van der Werf Julius H J, Henryon Mark, Chu Thinh Tuan, Wood Benjamin J, Hermesch Susanne

Abstract excerpt

BACKGROUND: In this study, we tested whether genotyping both live and dead animals (GSD) realises more genetic gain for post-weaning survival (PWS) in pigs compared to genotyping only live animals (GOS). METHODS: Stochastic simulation was used to estimate the rate of genetic gain realised by GSD and GOS at a 0.01 rate of pedigree-based inbreeding in three breeding schemes, which differed in PWS (95%, 90% and 50%)...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Breeding
Share to Genotyping Techniques

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Inbreeding

Share to Litter Size

Share to Models, Genetic

Share to Selection, Genetic

Share to Weaning

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 39294578
DOI: 10.1186/s12711-024-00932-4
PMCID: PMC11409791

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-07.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Genotyping both live and dead animals to improve post-weaning survival of pigs in breeding programs.PMID 39294578Read ↗

Genomic selection for maternal traits in pigs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Changes in genetic parameters for fitness and growth traits in pigs under genomic selection.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Improving genetic evaluation of litter size and piglet mortality for both genotyped and nongenotyped individuals using a single-step method.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Empirical comparison between different methods for genomic prediction of number of piglets born alive in moderate sized breeding populations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Investigating pig survival in different production phases using genomic models.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Sparse single-step method for genomic evaluation in pigs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

New phenotypes for new breeding goals in pigs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Single-step methods for genomic evaluation in pigs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The predicted benefits of genomic selection on pig breeding objectives.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Boundaries for genotype, phenotype, and pedigree truncation in genomic evaluations in pigs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic aspects of piglet survival and related traits: a review.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic selection for slaughter age in pigs using the Cox frailty model.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.