Phenotyping in clinical laterality research: a comparison of commonly used methods to determine mixed-handedness and ambidexterity.

doi:10.1080/1357650X.2024.2370871

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Back to search

Article

Phenotyping in clinical laterality research: a comparison of commonly used methods to determine mixed-handedness and ambidexterity.

Laterality - 1 May 2024

Mundorf Annakarina, Getzmann Stephan, Gajewski Patrick D, Larra Mauro F, Wascher Edmund, Genç Erhan, Ocklenburg Sebastian

Abstract excerpt

An increased prevalence of mixed-handedness has been reported in several neurodevelopmental and psychiatric disorders. Unfortunately, there is high between-study variability in the definition of mixed-handedness, leading to a major methodological problem in clinical laterality research and endangering replicability and comparability of research findings. Adding to this challenge is the fact that sometimes...

Topics

Humans
Functional Laterality
Female
Male
Adult
Phenotype
Middle Aged
Young Adult
Adolescent
Aged

Source

Open in PubMed

Identifiers

PMID: 38968414
DOI: 10.1080/1357650X.2024.2370871

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 30 Aug 2026.

Community interpretation

Discuss the evidence

Ask a question, add context or challenge an interpretation. Community activity is separate from scientific evidence strength.

discussions

replies

Citations encouraged

Claims remain attributable.

No discussion yet

Be the first to add a careful, cited interpretation.

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics