Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Beyond severity: utility as a criterion for setting the scope of RGCS

29 May 2024

Abstract excerpt

Reproductive genetic carrier screening (RGCS) allows prospective parents to identify and act upon their chances of having a child with a genetic condition. In deciding which genetic conditions to include in RGCS, severity is often used as a criterion. However, the concept is inherently complex, subjective and multidimensional, and determinations of severity will remain intractably contested. We propose the...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances
Share to Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics

Source

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Identifiers

PMID: 38811715
DOI: 10.1038/s41431-024-01640-9

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 8 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Beyond severity: utility as a criterion for setting the scope of RGCSPMID 38811715Read ↗

How should severity be understood in the context of reproductive genetic carrier screening?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Unpacking the notion of “serious” genetic conditions: towards implementation in reproductive decision-making?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Defining ethical criteria to guide the expanded use of Noninvasive Prenatal Screening (NIPS): Lessons about severity from preimplantation genetic testingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Generating a taxonomy for genetic conditions relevant to reproductive planningSemantic proximity Read ↗

Reevaluating ‘seriousness’ in genetic conditions: balancing clinical criteria and lived experiencesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluating standards for ‘serious’ disease for preimplantation genetic testing: a multi-case study on regulatory frameworks in Japan, the UK, and Western AustraliaSemantic proximity Read ↗

Genome sequencing and carrier testing: decisions on categorization and whether to disclose results of carrier testingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Patients' ratings of genetic conditions validate a taxonomy to simplify decisions about preconception carrier screening via genome sequencingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Toward the diagnosis of rare childhood genetic diseases: what do parents value most?Semantic proximity Read ↗

What is a ‘serious’ genetic condition? The perceptions of people living with genetic conditionsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Qualifying choice: ethical reflection on the scope of prenatal screeningSemantic proximity Read ↗

Personal utility in genomic testing: is there such a thing?Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.