Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

An evaluation of gingival phenotype and thickness as determined by indirect and direct methods.

The Angle orthodontist - 1 Nov 2023

Kong Jessica, Aps Johan, Naoum Steven, Lee Richard, Miranda Leticia Algarves, Murray Kevin, Hartsfield James K, Goonewardene Mithran S

Abstract excerpt

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate gingival phenotype (GP) and thickness (GT) using visual, probing, and ultrasound (US) methods and to assess the accuracy and consistency of clinicians to visually identify GP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The GP and GT of maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth in 29 orthodontic patients (mean age 25 ± 7.5 years) were assessed using probing and US by a single examiner. General dentist and dental...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Adolescent
Share to Gingiva

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Incisor

Share to Maxilla

Share to Phenotype

Share to Young Adult

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 37407506
DOI: 10.2319/081622-573.1
PMCID: PMC10633790

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-08.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

An evaluation of gingival phenotype and thickness as determined by indirect and direct methods.PMID 37407506Read ↗

The evaluation of gingival phenotype by clinicians using the visual inspection method.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Identification of thin and thick gingival phenotypes by two transparency methods: A diagnostic accuracy study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Are colored periodontal probes reliable to classify the gingival phenotype in terms of gingival thickness?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Gingival phenotype assessment methods and classifications revisited: a preclinical study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Determining the periodontal phenotype-Probe transparency versus actual: A diagnostic study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Methods to assess tooth gingival thickness and diagnose gingival phenotypes: A systematic review.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of gingival thickness by CBCT versus transgingival probing and estimation of cut-off values for gingival phenotype - A cross-sectional study in adults.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Gingival Phenotype Assessment: A Comparative Study of A Novel CBCT-Based Measurement Technique and Transgingival ProbingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Gingival phenotypes and dimensions of the soft periodontal tissues: a cross-sectional clinical and histological study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Diagnostic Accuracy of the Gingival Phenotype by the Transparency of the Periodontal Probe Through the Gingival Sulcus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Gingival landmarks, cutoff values, and related variables for determining gingival phenotypes: A scoping review.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluation of the association between gingival phenotype and alveolar bone thickness: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.