Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Identification of thin and thick gingival phenotypes by two transparency methods: A diagnostic accuracy study.

Journal of periodontology - 1 May 2023

da Costa Fernanda A, Perussolo Jeniffer, Dias Debora R, Araújo Maurício G

Abstract excerpt

BACKGROUND: There is limited information on the diagnostic accuracy of the transparency method to diagnose gingival phenotypes taking into consideration not only the gingival thickness (GT) but also the keratinized tissue width (KTW). Thus, the aim of the present study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of two transparency methods using a conventional steel probe (SP) and a plastic color-coded probe (CCP) to...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Gingiva
Share to Oral and gingival health research

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Oral microbiology and periodontitis research

Share to Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments

Share to Phenotype

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 36504403
DOI: 10.1002/JPER.22-0488

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Identification of thin and thick gingival phenotypes by two transparency methods: A diagnostic accuracy study.PMID 36504403Read ↗

Are colored periodontal probes reliable to classify the gingival phenotype in terms of gingival thickness?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Determining the periodontal phenotype-Probe transparency versus actual: A diagnostic study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The evaluation of gingival phenotype by clinicians using the visual inspection method.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Gingival phenotypes and dimensions of the soft periodontal tissues: a cross-sectional clinical and histological study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Gingival phenotype assessment methods and classifications revisited: a preclinical study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Diagnostic Accuracy of the Gingival Phenotype by the Transparency of the Periodontal Probe Through the Gingival Sulcus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Methods to assess tooth gingival thickness and diagnose gingival phenotypes: A systematic review.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Clinical and computed tomographic evaluations of periodontal phenotypes in a Chinese population: a cross-sectional study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of gingival thickness by CBCT versus transgingival probing and estimation of cut-off values for gingival phenotype - A cross-sectional study in adults.Semantic proximity Read ↗

An evaluation of gingival phenotype and thickness as determined by indirect and direct methods.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Periodontal phenotype: A review of historical and current classifications evaluating different methods and characteristics.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Diagnostic accuracy of transmucosal probe visualization for peri-implant mucosal phenotype assessment: A cross-sectional study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.