Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Genetic variants with discordant classifications: An assessment of genetic counselor attitudes and practices.

Journal of genetic counseling - 1 Feb 2023

Lahiri Sayoni, Reys Brian, Wunder Julia, Pirzadeh-Miller Sara

Abstract excerpt

Discordant variant classifications (DVCs) can impact patient care and pose challenges for clinicians. A survey-based study was conducted to examine genetic counselor (GC) attitudes and practices related to DVCs. Most GCs (202/229, 88%) in the study provide direct patient care across clinical specialties; review patients' genetic test results to determine if reported genetic variants have DVCs (176/202, 88%); and...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Emotions
Share to Genetic Predisposition to Disease

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Genetic Testing

Share to Genetic Variation

Share to Surveys and Questionnaires

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 35978490
DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1626

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 5 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Genetic variants with discordant classifications: An assessment of genetic counselor attitudes and practices.PMID 35978490Read ↗

Assessing patient communication preferences for reclassified variants of uncertain significance in a general genetics clinic.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Clinical and laboratory genetic counselor attitudes on the reporting of variants of uncertain significance for multigene cancer panels.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic counselors' practices and confidence regarding variant of uncertain significance results and reclassification from BRCA testing.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Imprecision medicine: Systematic gaps in reporting variants of uncertain significance (VUS) and their reclassifications.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The Challenge of Genetic Variants of Uncertain Clinical Significance : A Narrative Review.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Physician interpretation of variants of uncertain significance.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluation of Clinical Practices Related to Variants of Uncertain Significance Results in Inherited Cardiac Arrhythmia and Inherited Cardiomyopathy Genes.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Managing Variant Interpretation Discrepancies in Hereditary Cancer: Clinical Practice, Concerns, and Desired Resources.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A taxonomic schema of potential pitfalls in clinical variant analysis based on real-world evidence.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A TAXONOMIC SCHEMA OF POTENTIAL PITFALLS IN CLINICAL VARIANT ANALYSIS BASED ON REAL-WORLD EVIDENCESemantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic testing and cancer risk management recommendations by physicians for at-risk relatives.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Pitfalls and challenges in genetic test interpretation: An exploration of genetic professionals experience with interpretation of resultsSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.