Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Comparison of analytical sensitivity and efficiency for SARS-CoV-2 primer sets by TaqMan-based and SYBR Green-based RT-qPCR

26 Feb 2022

Abstract excerpt

The pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) continues to threaten public health. For developing countries where vaccines are still in shortage, cheaper alternative molecular methods for SARS-CoV-2 identification can be crucial to prevent the next wave. Therefore, 14 primer sets recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) was evaluated on testing both clinical patient and environmental samples with...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Biosensors and Analytical Detection
Share to SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Share to SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 35218386
DOI: 10.1007/s00253-022-11822-4

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 8 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Comparison of analytical sensitivity and efficiency for SARS-CoV-2 primer sets by TaqMan-based and SYBR Green-based RT-qPCRPMID 35218386Read ↗

Low Cost SYBR Green-Based RT-qPCR for Detecting SARS-CoV-2 in Indonesia Setting Using WHO-Recommended PrimersSemantic proximity Read ↗

Optimization of primer sets and detection protocols for SARS-CoV-2 of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) using PCR and real-time PCRSemantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison five primer sets from different genome region of COVID-19 for detection of virus infection by conventional RT-PCRSemantic proximity Read ↗

RT-qPCR Testing of SARS-CoV-2: A PrimerSemantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison and Sensitivity Evaluation of Three Different Commercial Real-Time Quantitative PCR Kits for SARS-CoV-2 DetectionSemantic proximity Read ↗

Primer design for quantitative real-time PCR for the emerging Coronavirus SARS-CoV-2Semantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluation Of SYBR Green Real Time PCR For Detecting SARS-CoV-2 From Clinical SamplesSemantic proximity Read ↗

High Concordance Between SYBR Green and TaqMan PCR for SARS-CoV-2 Detection in Nasopharyngeal and Saliva SamplesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Analytical sensitivity and efficiency comparisons of SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR primer-probe sets.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Assessment of 12 Quantitative RT-PCR Commercial Kits for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2Semantic proximity Read ↗

How to choose the right real-time RT-PCR primer sets for the SARS-CoV-2 genome detection? Semantic proximity Read ↗

Development of a robust TaqMan probe-based one-step multiplex RT-qPCR for simultaneous detection of SARS-CoV-2 and Influenza A/B virusesSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.