Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Variability of cycle threshold values in an external quality assessment scheme for detection of the SARS-CoV-2 virus genome by RT-PCR

16 Dec 2020

Abstract excerpt

Abstract Objectives The qualitative results of SARS-CoV-2 specific real-time reverse transcription (RT) PCR are used for initial diagnosis and follow-up of Covid-19 patients and asymptomatic virus carriers. However, clinical decision-making and health management policies often are based additionally on cycle threshold (Ct) values (i.e., quantitative results) to guide patient care, segregation and discharge...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
Share to SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Share to SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 33554519
DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2020-1602

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 8 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Variability of cycle threshold values in an external quality assessment scheme for detection of the SARS-CoV-2 virus genome by RT-PCRPMID 33554519Read ↗

Inclusion of cycle threshold (CT) values when reporting SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR results improves clinical Interpretation in suspected and confirmed COVID-19Semantic proximity Read ↗

Analysis of external quality assessment samples revealed crucial performance differences between commercial RT-PCR assays for SARS-CoV-2 detection when taking extraction methods and real-time-PCR instruments into accountSemantic proximity Read ↗

Analysis of external quality assessment samples revealed crucial performance differences between commercial RT-PCR assays for SARS-CoV-2 detection when taking extraction methods and real-time-PCR instruments into accountSemantic proximity Read ↗

Discrepancies in the detection of SARS-CoV-2 by qRT-PCR are dependent on the target gene used for its amplification: Implications in the diagnosis of clinical infectionSemantic proximity Read ↗

Caution in interpretation of SARS-CoV-2 quantification based on RT-PCR cycle threshold valueSemantic proximity Read ↗

Preanalytical Issues and Cycle Threshold Values in SARS-CoV-2 Real-Time RT-PCR Testing: Should Test Results Include These?Semantic proximity Read ↗

True or false: what are the factors that influence COVID-19 diagnosis by RT-qPCR?Semantic proximity Read ↗

RT-qPCR Diagnostics: The “Drosten” Sars-Cov-2 Assay ParadigmSemantic proximity Read ↗

Commercially available SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR diagnostic tests need obligatory internal validationSemantic proximity Read ↗

Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Clinical Samples: Target-specific Analysis of Qualitative Reverse Transcription–Polymerase Chain Reaction(RT-PCR) Diagnostic KitsSemantic proximity Read ↗

<i>ct2vl</i> : Converting Ct Values to Viral Loads for SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR Test ResultsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison and Sensitivity Evaluation of Three Different Commercial Real-Time Quantitative PCR Kits for SARS-CoV-2 DetectionSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.