Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Motivators of Inappropriate Ovarian Cancer Screening: A Survey of Women and Their Clinicians.

JNCI cancer spectrum - 1 Feb 2021

Macdonald Courtney, Mazza Danielle, Hickey Martha, Hunter Morgan, Keogh Louise A, Investigators kConFab, Jones Sandra C, Saunders Christobel, Nesci Stephanie, Milne Roger L, McLachlan Sue-Anne, Hopper John L, Friedlander Michael L, Emery Jon, Phillips Kelly-Anne

Abstract excerpt

Background: This study examined why women and doctors screen for ovarian cancer (OC) contrary to guidelines. Methods: Surveys, based on the Theoretical Domains Framework, were sent to women in the Kathleen Cuningham Foundation Consortium for Research into Familial Breast Cancer and family physicians and gynecologists who organized their screening. Results: Of 1264 Kathleen Cuningham Foundation Consortium for...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Attitude to Health
Share to Australia

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Genes, BRCA1

Share to Genes, BRCA2

Share to Guideline Adherence

Share to Motivation

Share to Surveys and Questionnaires

Share to Ultrasonography

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 33554034
DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkaa110
PMCID: PMC7853181

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 6 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-06.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 6 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Motivators of Inappropriate Ovarian Cancer Screening: A Survey of Women and Their Clinicians.PMID 33554034Read ↗

Women's awareness of ovarian cancer risks and symptoms.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Universal BRCA1/BRCA2 Testing for Ovarian Cancer Patients is Welcomed, but with Care: How Women and Staff Contextualize Experiences of Expanded Access.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Risk-Reducing Salpingectomy: Considerations from an OBGYN PerspectiveSemantic proximity Read ↗

Illness representations and distress in women undergoing screening for familial ovarian cancer.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Barriers and facilitators to BRCA genetic counseling among at-risk Latinas in New York City.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Health seeking related to ovarian cancer.Semantic proximity Read ↗

There is no decision to make: experiences and attitudes toward treatment-focused genetic testing among women diagnosed with ovarian cancer.Semantic proximity Read ↗

An exploratory qualitative study of women's perceptions of risk management options for familial ovarian cancer: implications for informed decision making.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Adapting the coping in deliberation (CODE) framework: a multi-method approach in the context of familial ovarian cancer risk management.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Impact of Genetic Counseling and Testing on Altruistic Motivations to Test for BRCA1/2: a Longitudinal Study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Breast Cancer Chemoprevention: Use and Views of Australian Women and Their Clinicians.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Identifying ways to maximise cervical screening uptake: a qualitative study of GPs’ and practice nurses’ cervical cancer screening-related behavioursSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.