Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Discriminant validity of the alternative model of personality disorder.

Psychological assessment - 1 Dec 2020

McCabe Gillian A, Widiger Thomas A

Abstract excerpt

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)-5 Section III alternative model of personality disorder (AMPD) was developed to rectify some of the failings of the DSM-IV personality disorders, including a lack of compelling discriminant validity. The primary purpose of the current study was to provide a direct comparison of DSM-IV with DSM-5 Section III AMPD with respect to discriminant validity...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Diagnosis, Differential
Share to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Personality Disorders

Share to Personality Inventory

Share to Phenotype

Share to Psychotherapy

Share to Reproducibility of Results

Share to Self Report

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 32991197
DOI: 10.1037/pas0000955

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-07.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Discriminant validity of the alternative model of personality disorder.PMID 32991197Read ↗

The problems with Criterion A: A comment on Morey et al. (2022).Semantic proximity Read ↗

DSM-5 alternative personality disorder model traits as extreme variants of five-factor model traits in adolescents.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The DSM should replace maladaptive traits with the five-factor model: Comment on Clark and Watson (2022).Semantic proximity Read ↗

Categorical and dimensional models of personality disorder.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Examining the Structure of Personality DysfunctionSemantic proximity Read ↗

Normative and Maladaptive Personality Traits in Borderline Personality Disorder: A Comparative and Hierarchical Analysis of HEXACO and PID-5Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparing the DSM-5 Personality Disorder Models Scored from the Same InterviewSemantic proximity Read ↗

A Comparison of Borderline Personality Features and Level of Personality Functioning in Explaining Mentalizing CapacitySemantic proximity Read ↗

Global personality dysfunction and the relationship of pathological and normal trait domains in the DSM-5 alternative model for personality disorders.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Predicting dropout using DSM-5 Section II personality disorders, and DSM-5 Section III personality traits, in a (day)clinical sample of personality disorders.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Antisocial personality disorder and psychopathy: The AMPD in review.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Validating the German Version of the Personality Disorder Severity-ICD-11 Scale Using Nominal Response ModelsSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.