Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Predicting dropout using DSM-5 Section II personality disorders, and DSM-5 Section III personality traits, in a (day)clinical sample of personality disorders.

Personality disorders - 1 Jul 2021

Berghuis Han, Bandell Coen C, Krueger Robert F

Abstract excerpt

Despite the availability of structured treatments for personality disorders (PDs), still 1 in 4 patients drop out of treatment. Knowledge of whether maladaptive personality traits can lead to dropout in psychotherapeutic treatment programs of PDs is important for the purpose of a suitable indication for such treatments, especially in the light of the new alternative model of personality disorders (AMPD), which is...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Share to Personality

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Personality Disorders

Share to Personality Inventory

Share to Phenotype

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 32730060
DOI: 10.1037/per0000429

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-07.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Predicting dropout using DSM-5 Section II personality disorders, and DSM-5 Section III personality traits, in a (day)clinical sample of personality disorders.PMID 32730060Read ↗

DSM-5 alternative personality disorder model traits as extreme variants of five-factor model traits in adolescents.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The problems with Criterion A: A comment on Morey et al. (2022).Semantic proximity Read ↗

Normative and Maladaptive Personality Traits in Borderline Personality Disorder: A Comparative and Hierarchical Analysis of HEXACO and PID-5Semantic proximity Read ↗

Examining the Structure of Personality Dysfunction Among Individuals Involved in Mental Health Care: A Registered ReportSemantic proximity Read ↗

Latent Profiles of Patients with Borderline Pathology Based on the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality DisordersSemantic proximity Read ↗

Getting the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 ready for clinical practice: Norm values and correlates in a representative sample from the German populationSemantic proximity Read ↗

Validating the German Version of the Personality Disorder Severity-ICD-11 Scale Using Nominal Response ModelsSemantic proximity Read ↗

A DSM-5 AMPD and ICD-11 compatible measure for an early identification of personality disorders in adolescence – LoPF-Q 12-18 latent structure and short formSemantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluating the role of functional impairment in personality psychopathology.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluating the Assessment of the ICD-11 Personality Disorder Diagnostic SystemSemantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluating the Assessment of the ICD-11 Personality Disorder Diagnostic SystemSemantic proximity Read ↗

Comparing the DSM-5 Personality Disorder Models Scored from the Same InterviewSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.