Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Comparison of a Point-of-Care Assay and a High-Complexity Assay for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA

4 Aug 2020

Abstract excerpt

BACKGROUND: Numerous nucleic acid amplification assays utilizing different target genes of the SARS-CoV-2 genome have received emergency use authorization (EUA) by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Limited data are available comparing the test performance characteristics of these assays. METHODS: A diagnostic comparison study was performed to evaluate the performance of the Cepheid Xpert...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Biosensors and Analytical Detection
Share to Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications
Share to SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 32761092
DOI: 10.1093/jalm/jfaa135

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Comparison of a Point-of-Care Assay and a High-Complexity Assay for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNAPMID 32761092Read ↗

Test Agreement Between Roche Cobas 6800 and Cepheid GeneXpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 Assays at High Cycle Threshold RangesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of the Accula SARS-CoV-2 Test with a Laboratory-Developed Assay for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in Clinical Nasopharyngeal SpecimensSemantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of three molecular diagnostic assays for SARS‐CoV‐2 detection: Evaluation of analytical sensitivity and clinical performanceSemantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluation of the automated cartridge-based ARIES SARS-CoV-2 Assay (RUO) against automated Cepheid Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 PCR as gold standardSemantic proximity Read ↗

CovidNudge: diagnostic accuracy of a novel lab-free point-of-care diagnostic for SARS-CoV-2Semantic proximity Read ↗

Clinical evaluation of a multiplex RT-PCR assay for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in individual and pooled upper respiratory tract samplesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of Two High-Throughput Reverse Transcription-PCR Systems for the Detection of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of four PCR and two point of care assays used in the laboratory detection of SARS-CoV-2Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of two commercial platforms and a laboratory developed test for detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNASemantic proximity Read ↗

Point-of-Care Air Surveillance of Respiratory Pathogens Using the GeneXpert® SystemSemantic proximity Read ↗

Clinical Assessment of the Roche SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen TestSemantic proximity Read ↗

Concordance between PCR-based extraction-free saliva and nasopharyngeal swabs for SARS-CoV-2 testingSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.