Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Comparison of three molecular diagnostic assays for SARS‐CoV‐2 detection: Evaluation of analytical sensitivity and clinical performance

12 Jan 2022

Abstract excerpt

BACKGROUND: Currently, SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection using real-time reverse-transcription PCR (rRT-PCR) is the standard diagnostic test for COVID-19 infection. Various rRT-PCR assays are currently used worldwide, targeting different genes of the SARS-CoV-2. Here, we compared the analytical sensitivity and clinical performance (sensitivity and specificity) of Allplex SARS-CoV-2/FluA/FluB/RSV assay (Seegene), Standard...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications
Share to SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Share to SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 35019184
DOI: 10.1002/jcla.24242

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 5 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Comparison of three molecular diagnostic assays for SARS‐CoV‐2 detection: Evaluation of analytical sensitivity and clinical performancePMID 35019184Read ↗

SARS-CoV-2 Variants Genotyping and Diagnostic Performance of a 2-Genes Detection Assay.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluation of WHO listed COVID-19 qPCR primers and probe in silico with 375 SERS-CoV-2 full genome sequencesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Comparative Analysis of Four Commercial RT-PCR Diagnostic Assay for Detection of Covid-19Semantic proximity Read ↗

A Novel Multiplex PCR Based Detection Assay Using Saliva or Nasopharyngeal Samples for SARS-Cov-2, Influenza A and B – Clinical Validation and Utility for Mass SurveillanceSemantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of eleven in vitro diagnostic assays for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNASemantic proximity Read ↗

Clinical validation of a multiplex PCR-based detection assay using saliva or nasopharyngeal samples for SARS-Cov-2, influenza A and BSemantic proximity Read ↗

Validation of RT-qPCR primers and probes for new and old variants of SARS-CoV-2 in a world scaleSemantic proximity Read ↗

Clinical evaluation of a multiplex RT-PCR assay for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in individual and pooled upper respiratory tract samplesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Highly sensitive detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA by multiplex rRT-PCR for molecular diagnosis of COVID-19 by clinical laboratoriesSemantic proximity Read ↗

A Method to evaluate analytical sensitivity of qRT-PCR kits for SARS-CoV-2 detectionSemantic proximity Read ↗

New RT-PCR Assay for the Detection of Current and Future SARS-CoV-2 VariantsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison and Sensitivity Evaluation of Three Different Commercial Real-Time Quantitative PCR Kits for SARS-CoV-2 DetectionSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.