Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Seven Years of Vitrified Blastocyst Transfers: Comparison of 3 Preparation Protocols at a Single ART Center

29 May 2020

Abstract excerpt

Introduction: Frozen–thawed embryo transfers (FET) have become a standard practice to increase cumulative pregnancy rates, however, the choice of the best preparation protocol remains a matter of debate. Design: Retrospective analysis of clinical pregnancy (CPR) and live birth rate (LBR) of FET in natural cycles (NC-FET), modified natural cycles with hCG-triggered ovulation (mNC-FET) and hormonal artificial...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
Share to Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Share to Reproductive Biology and Fertility

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 32547496
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2020.00346

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Seven Years of Vitrified Blastocyst Transfers: Comparison of 3 Preparation Protocols at a Single ART CenterPMID 32547496Read ↗

Progesterone-modified natural cycle preparation for frozen embryo transferSemantic proximity Read ↗

Endometrial preparation protocols for frozen embryo transfer: risk assessment and individualized managementSemantic proximity Read ↗

Pregnancy Outcomes for Single Frozen-thawed Blastocyst Transfer of Day 5 and Day 6 With Different Quality: a Large Matched-cohort StudySemantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison between two protocols for thawed embryo transfer: natural cycle versus exogenous hormone replacementSemantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of pregnancy outcomes following fresh and electively frozen single blastocyst transfer in natural cycle and clomiphene-stimulated IVF cyclesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Day 5 vitrified blastocyst transfer versus day 6 vitrified blastocyst transfer in oocyte donation programSemantic proximity Read ↗

No difference in cumulative live birth rates between cleavage versus blastocyst transfer in patients with four or fewer zygotes: results from a retrospective studySemantic proximity Read ↗

Frozen-thawed embryos generated from successful fresh IVF cycles have higher potential for favorable outcome than frozen-thawed embryos obtained from unsuccessful fresh cycles: A retrospective cohortSemantic proximity Read ↗

Fresh versus frozen embryo transfer: backing clinical decisions with scientific and clinical evidenceSemantic proximity Read ↗

Fresh or Frozen Embryo Transfer in In Vitro Fertilization: An UpdateSemantic proximity Read ↗

Patient- and cycle-specific factors affecting the outcome of frozen–thawed embryo transfersSemantic proximity Read ↗

Natural proliferative phase frozen embryo transfer—a new approach which may facilitate scheduling without hindering pregnancy outcomesSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.