Multi-Institutional Evaluation of Interrater Agreement of Variant Classification Based on the 2017 Association for Molecular Pathology, American Society of Clinical Oncology, and College of American Pathologists Standards and Guidelines for the Interpretation and Reporting of Sequence Variants in Cancer.

doi:10.1016/j.jmoldx.2019.10.010

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Community

Back to search

Article

Multi-Institutional Evaluation of Interrater Agreement of Variant Classification Based on the 2017 Association for Molecular Pathology, American Society of Clinical Oncology, and College of American Pathologists Standards and Guidelines for the Interpretation and Reporting of Sequence Variants in Cancer.

The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD - 1 Feb 2020

Sirohi Deepika, Schmidt Robert L, Aisner Dara L, Behdad Amir, Betz Bryan L, Brown Noah, Coleman Joshua F, Corless Christopher L, Deftereos Georgios, Ewalt Mark D, Fernandes Helen, Hsiao Susan J, Mansukhani Mahesh M, Murray Sarah S, Niu Nifang, Ritterhouse Lauren L, Suarez Carlos J, Tafe Laura J, Thorson John A, Segal Jeremy P, Furtado Larissa V

Abstract excerpt

This multi-institutional study was undertaken to evaluate interrater reliability of the 2017 Association for Molecular Pathology/American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guidelines for interpretation and reporting of oncology sequence variants and to assess current practices and perceptions surrounding these guidelines. Fifty-one variants were distributed to 20 participants from 10...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Genetic Association Studies

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Genetic Testing

Share to Genetic Variation

Share to Neoplasms

Share to Practice Guidelines as Topic

Share to Reproducibility of Results

Share to Sensitivity and Specificity

Share to United States

Source

Open in PubMed

Identifiers

PMID: 31837433
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2019.10.010

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-07.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Multi-Institutional Evaluation of Interrater Agreement of Variant Classification Based on the 2017 Association for Molecular Pathology, American Society of Clinical Oncology, and College of American Pathologists Standards and Guidelines for the Interpretation and Reporting of Sequence Variants in Cancer.PMID 31837433Read ↗

An Educational Assessment of Evidence Used for Variant Classification: A Report of the Association for Molecular Pathology.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Standard operating procedure for somatic variant refinement of sequencing data with paired tumor and normal samples.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Standard operating procedure for somatic variant refinement of tumor sequencing dataSemantic proximity Read ↗

Reporting of somatic variants in clinical cancer care: recommendations of the Swiss Society of Molecular Pathology.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Evidence-based recommendations for gene-specific ACMG/AMP variant classification from the ClinGen ENIGMA BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variant Curation Expert PanelSemantic proximity Read ↗

[Variant interpretation in molecular pathology and oncology : An introduction].Semantic proximity Read ↗

The current state of clinical interpretation of sequence variants.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Internal Standardization of the Interpretation and Reporting of Sequence Variants in Hematologic Neoplasms.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A harmonized meta-knowledgebase of clinical interpretations of somatic genomic variants in cancer.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Cancer Variant Interpretation Group UK (CanVIG-UK): updates on an exemplar national subspecialty multidisciplinary networkSemantic proximity Read ↗

Variant Interpretation for Cancer (VIC): a computational tool for assessing clinical impacts of somatic variantsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Evidence-based recommendations for gene-specific ACMG/AMP variant classification from the ClinGen ENIGMA BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variant Curation Expert Panel.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.