Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Accuracy of genomic BLUP when considering a genomic relationship matrix based on the number of the largest eigenvalues: a simulation study.

Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE - 12 Dec 2019

Pocrnic Ivan, Lourenco Daniela A L, Masuda Yutaka, Misztal Ignacy

Abstract excerpt

BACKGROUND: The dimensionality of genomic information is limited by the number of independent chromosome segments (Me), which is a function of the effective population size. This dimensionality can be determined approximately by singular value decomposition of the gene content matrix, by eigenvalue decomposition of the genomic relationship matrix (GRM), or by the number of core animals in the algorithm for proven...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Algorithms
Share to Computer Simulation

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Genomics

Share to Phenotype

Share to Population Density

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 31830899
DOI: 10.1186/s12711-019-0516-0
PMCID: PMC6907194

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-07.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Accuracy of genomic BLUP when considering a genomic relationship matrix based on the number of the largest eigenvalues: a simulation study.PMID 31830899Read ↗

The Dimensionality of Genomic Information and Its Effect on Genomic Prediction.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Large-scale genomic prediction using singular value decomposition of the genotype matrix.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Dimensionality of genomic information and performance of the Algorithm for Proven and Young for different livestock species.Semantic proximity Read ↗

On the equivalence between marker effect models and breeding value models and direct genomic values with the Algorithm for Proven and Young.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Emerging issues in genomic selection.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Core-dependent changes in genomic predictions using the Algorithm for Proven and Young in single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction.Semantic proximity Read ↗

An analytical framework to derive the expected precision of genomic selection.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic Prediction of Complex Traits, Principles, Overview of Factors Affecting the Reliability of Genomic Prediction, and Algebra of the Reliability.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Response to genomic selection: the Bulmer effect and the potential of genomic selection when the number of phenotypic records is limiting.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Factors affecting accuracy of estimated effective number of chromosome segments for numerically small breeds.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Dimensionality of genomic information and its impact on genome-wide associations and variant selection for genomic prediction: a simulation study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Optimisation of the core subset for the APY approximation of genomic relationships.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.