Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Bias in estimates of variance components in populations undergoing genomic selection: a simulation study.

BMC genomics - 9 Dec 2019

Gao Hongding, Madsen Per, Aamand Gert Pedersen, Thomasen Jørn Rind, Sørensen Anders Christian, Jensen Just

Abstract excerpt

BACKGROUND: After the extensive implementation of genomic selection (GS), the choice of the statistical model and data used to estimate variance components (VCs) remains unclear. A primary concern is that VCs estimated from a traditional pedigree-based animal model (P-AM) will be biased due to ignoring the impact of GS. The objectives of this study were to examine the effects of GS on estimates of VC in the...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Bayes Theorem
Share to Bias
Share to Breeding

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Cattle

Share to Computer Simulation

Share to Genetic Markers

Share to Genome

Share to Genomics

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 31818251
DOI: 10.1186/s12864-019-6323-8
PMCID: PMC6902321

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-07.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Bias in estimates of variance components in populations undergoing genomic selection: a simulation study.PMID 31818251Read ↗

Comparison of genomic and traditional BLUP-estimated breeding value accuracy and selection response under alternative trait and genomic parameters.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Effect of genomic selection and genotyping strategy on estimation of variance components in animal models using different relationship matrices.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Methods to detect selection history in a population under ongoing directional selection.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Reliabilities of genomic estimated breeding values in Danish Jersey.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison between estimation of breeding values and fixed effects using Bayesian and empirical BLUP estimation under selection on parents and missing pedigree information.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Persistence of accuracy of genome-wide breeding values over generations when including a polygenic effect.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Single-step genomic model improved reliability and reduced the bias of genomic predictions in Danish Jersey.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Impacts of genotyping strategies on long-term genetic response in genomic selection.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Technical note: Impact of pedigree depth on convergence of single-step genomic BLUP in a purebred swine population.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A comparison of methods to estimate genomic relationships using pedigree and markers in livestock populations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The Accuracy and Bias of Single-Step Genomic Prediction for Populations Under Selection.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Reliability of pedigree-based and genomic evaluations in selected populations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.