Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Ethical and Professional Challenges Posed by Patients with Genetic Concerns: A Report of Focus Group Discussions with Genetic Counselors, Physicians, and Nurses

1 Apr 2001

Abstract excerpt

Ninety-seven physicians, nurses, and genetic counselors from four regions within the United States participated in focus groups to identify the types of ethical and professional challenges that arise when their patients have genetic concerns. Responses were taped and transcribed and then analyzed using the Hill et al. (1997, Counsel Psychol 25:517-522) Consensual Qualitative Research method of analysis. Sixteen...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to BRCA gene mutations in cancer
Share to Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 11767802
DOI: 10.1023/a:1009487513618

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 4 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Ethical and Professional Challenges Posed by Patients with Genetic Concerns: A Report of Focus Group Discussions with Genetic Counselors, Physicians, and NursesPMID 11767802Read ↗

A Survey of Genetic Counselors' Strategies for Addressing Ethical and Professional Challenges in PracticeSemantic proximity Read ↗

The duty to warn at-risk relatives-The experience of genetic counselors and medical geneticists.Semantic proximity Read ↗

“Not Tied Up Neatly with a Bow”: Professionals’ Challenging Cases in Informed Consent for Genomic SequencingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Experiences with obtaining informed consent for genomic sequencingSemantic proximity Read ↗

How do non-geneticist physicians deal with genetic tests? A qualitative analysisSemantic proximity Read ↗

An investigation of genetic counselors' discussion of genetic discrimination with cancer risk patients.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Medical geneticists' duty to warn at‐risk relatives for genetic diseaseSemantic proximity Read ↗

Ethics in genetic counsellingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Defining the Critical Components of Informed Consent for Genetic Testing: A Delphi StudySemantic proximity Read ↗

Whether, when, how, and how much? General public’s and cancer patients’ views about the disclosure of genomic secondary findingsSemantic proximity Read ↗

A preliminary investigation of genetic counselors' information needs when receiving a variant of uncertain significance result: a mixed methods study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Non-directive genetic counselling - respect for autonomy or unprofessional practice?Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.