Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Members of the public in the USA, UK, Canada and Australia expressing genetic exceptionalism say they are more willing to donate genomic data

29 Nov 2019

Abstract excerpt

Public acceptance is critical for sharing of genomic data at scale. This paper examines how acceptance of data sharing pertains to the perceived similarities and differences between DNA and other forms of personal data. It explores the perceptions of representative publics from the USA, Canada, the UK and Australia (n = 8967) towards the donation of DNA and health data. Fifty-two percent of this public held...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to BRCA gene mutations in cancer
Share to Ethics in Clinical Research

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 31784701
DOI: 10.1038/s41431-019-0550-y

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Members of the public in the USA, UK, Canada and Australia expressing genetic exceptionalism say they are more willing to donate genomic dataPMID 31784701Read ↗

Global Public Perceptions of Genomic Data Sharing: What Shapes the Willingness to Donate DNA and Health Data?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Willingness to donate genomic and other medical data: results from GermanySemantic proximity Read ↗

What Research Participants Want to Know About Genetic Research Results: The Impact of “Genetic Exceptionalism”Semantic proximity Read ↗

Ethical Considerations in Research with Genomic DataSemantic proximity Read ↗

Trust in genomic data sharing among members of the general public in the UK, USA, Canada and AustraliaSemantic proximity Read ↗

Open sharing of genomic data: Who does it and why?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Australians’ views and experience of personal genomic testing: survey findings from the Genioz studySemantic proximity Read ↗

Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: Prospective users’ attitudes toward information about ancestry and biological relationshipsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Secondary use of genomic data: patients’ decisions at point of testing and perspectives to inform international data sharingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Attitudes of nearly 7000 health professionals, genomic researchers and publics toward the return of incidental results from sequencing researchSemantic proximity Read ↗

Potential research participants support the return of raw sequence dataSemantic proximity Read ↗

To disclose, or not to disclose? Perspectives of clinical genomics professionals toward returning incidental findings from genomic researchSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.