Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Oocyte quantity, as well as oocyte quality, plays a significant role for the cumulative live birth rate of a POSEIDON criteria patient

20 Nov 2019

Abstract excerpt

Sir, We read with interest the article by Leijdekkers et al. (2019), who used the data from the OPTIMIST study to assess the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) in low-prognosis patients stratified according to the POSEIDON criteria (POSEIDON Group, 2016). The authors concluded that the differences in CLBR among POSEIDON groups are primarily due to the effect of female age on oocyte quality and suggested that...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
Share to Ovarian function and disorders
Share to Reproductive Biology and Fertility

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 31756248
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dez181

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Oocyte quantity, as well as oocyte quality, plays a significant role for the cumulative live birth rate of a POSEIDON criteria patientPMID 31756248Read ↗

Cumulative Live Birth Rates of Good and Low Prognosis Patients According to POSEIDON Criteria: A Single Center Analysis of 18,455 Treatment CyclesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Cumulative live birth rate prognosis based on the number of aspirated oocytes in previous ART cyclesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Cumulative live birth rates according to the number of oocytes retrieved after the first ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a multicenter multinational analysis including ∼15,000 womenSemantic proximity Read ↗

The effect of the embryo pooling method on the cumulative live birth rate in poor ovarian responders according to the Bologna criteriaSemantic proximity Read ↗

Double Stimulation in the Same Ovarian Cycle (DuoStim) to Maximize the Number of Oocytes Retrieved From Poor Prognosis Patients: A Multicenter Experience and SWOT AnalysisSemantic proximity Read ↗

Cumulative live birth rates and number of oocytes retrieved in women of advanced age. A single centre analysis including 4500 women ≥38 years oldSemantic proximity Read ↗

No difference in cumulative live birth rates between cleavage versus blastocyst transfer in patients with four or fewer zygotes: results from a retrospective studySemantic proximity Read ↗

Predicting personalized cumulative live birth rate after a complete in vitro fertilization cycle: an analysis of 32,306 treatment cycles in ChinaSemantic proximity Read ↗

Blastocyst euploidy rates in low-prognosis patients according to the POSEIDON criteria: a retrospective analysis of 3016 embryosSemantic proximity Read ↗

Cumulative live birth rates after IVF in patients with polycystic ovaries: phenotype matters.Semantic proximity Read ↗

What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction?Semantic proximity Read ↗

The effects of age, mature oocyte number, and cycle number on cumulative live birth rates after planned oocyte cryopreservationSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.