Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Diagnostic test accuracy of self-reported screening instruments in identifying frailty in community-dwelling older people: A systematic review.

Geriatrics & gerontology international - 1 Jan 2020

Ambagtsheer Rachel C, Thompson Mark Q, Archibald Mandy M, Casey Mavourneen G, Schultz Timothy J

Abstract excerpt

Against a backdrop of aging populations worldwide, it has become increasingly important to identify frailty screening instruments suitable for community settings. Self-reported and/or administered instruments might offer significant simplicity and efficiency advantages over clinician-administered instruments, but their comparative diagnostic test accuracy has yet to be systematically examined. The aim of this...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Frailty
Share to Geriatric Assessment

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Mass Screening

Share to PubMed

Share to Residence Characteristics

Share to Self Report

Share to Sensitivity and Specificity

Share to Surveys and Questionnaires

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 31729157
DOI: 10.1111/ggi.13810

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-07.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Diagnostic test accuracy of self-reported screening instruments in identifying frailty in community-dwelling older people: A systematic review.PMID 31729157Read ↗

Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracies of Frailty Assessment Tools for Frailty in Older PeopleSemantic proximity Read ↗

Systematic review of the utility of the frailty index and frailty phenotype to predict all-cause mortality in older people.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Self-Reported Frailty Screening Tools: Comparing Construct Validity of the Frailty Phenotype Questionnaire and FRAIL.Semantic proximity Read ↗

German translation, cross-cultural adaptation and diagnostic test accuracy of three frailty screening tools : PRISMA-7, FRAIL scale and Groningen Frailty Indicator.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Agreement Between 35 Published Frailty Scores in the General Population.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The diagnostic and predictive accuracy of the PRISMA-7 screening tool for frailty in older adults: A systematic review protocolSemantic proximity Read ↗

A self-reported screening tool for detecting community-dwelling older persons with frailty syndrome in the absence of mobility disability: the FiND questionnaire.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Frailty prevalence and associated factors in the Mexican health and aging study: A comparison of the frailty index and the phenotype.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Screening for Frailty With the FRAIL Scale: A Comparison With the Phenotype Criteria.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Screening for intrinsic capacity and frailty in the primary care population with multimorbidity using the Integrated Care for Older People Screening Tool and two different frailty measures – the Frailty Phenotype and Clinical Frailty Scale: a cross-sectional studySemantic proximity Read ↗

Tools for Assessing Frailty in Older People: General Concepts.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Physical Pre-Frailty Index for Early Detection of Functional Decline in Community-Dwelling Older AdultsSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.