Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Self-Reported Frailty Screening Tools: Comparing Construct Validity of the Frailty Phenotype Questionnaire and FRAIL.

Journal of the American Medical Directors Association - 1 Nov 2022

Chia Jia Qian, Low Kristabella, Chew Justin, Lim Jun Pei, Goh Liuh Ling, Wansaicheong Gervais, Lim Wee Shiong

Abstract excerpt

OBJECTIVES: We examined the construct validity of 2 self-reported frailty questionnaires, the Frailty Phenotype Questionnaire (FPQ) and FRAIL, against the Cardiovascular Health Study frailty phenotype (CHS-FP). DESIGN: Cross-sectional data analysis of longitudinal prospective cohort study. SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS: We included data from 230 older adults (mean age: 67.2 ± 7.4 years) from the "Longitudinal...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Biomarkers
Share to Cross-Sectional Studies

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Frail Elderly

Share to Frailty

Share to Geriatric Assessment

Share to Independent Living

Share to Self Report

Share to Surveys and Questionnaires

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 35660384
DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2022.04.046

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 2 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Self-Reported Frailty Screening Tools: Comparing Construct Validity of the Frailty Phenotype Questionnaire and FRAIL.PMID 35660384Read ↗

Screening for Frailty With the FRAIL Scale: A Comparison With the Phenotype Criteria.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Development, Construct Validity, and Predictive Validity of a Continuous Frailty Scale: Results From 2 Large US Cohorts.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The frailty phenotype and the frailty index: different instruments for different purposes.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Development of a Frailty Phenotype Questionnaire for Use in Screening Community-Dwelling Older Adults.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Systematic review of the utility of the frailty index and frailty phenotype to predict all-cause mortality in older people.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Frailty in NHANES: Comparing the frailty index and phenotype.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Frailty prevalence and associated factors in the Mexican health and aging study: A comparison of the frailty index and the phenotype.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Diagnostic test accuracy of self-reported screening instruments in identifying frailty in community-dwelling older people: A systematic review.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracies of Frailty Assessment Tools for Frailty in Older PeopleSemantic proximity Read ↗

A Modified Frailty Phenotype Used for Identifying Frailty in Health Care Practice: Validation Among Chinese Older Adults.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Development and Validation of a Nutritional Frailty Phenotype for Older Adults Based on Risk Prediction Model: Results from a Population-Based Prospective Cohort Study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Validation of the Kihon Checklist and the frailty screening index for frailty defined by the phenotype model in older Japanese adults.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.