Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

ICSI does not increase the cumulative live birth rate in non-male factor infertility

14 May 2018

Abstract excerpt

STUDY QUESTION: What is the cumulative live birth rate following ICSI cycles compared with IVF cycles for couples with non-male factor infertility? SUMMARY ANSWER: ICSI resulted in a similar cumulative live birth rate compared with IVF for couples with non-male factor infertility. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: The ICSI procedure was developed for couples with male factor infertility. There has been an increased use of...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
Share to Ovarian function and disorders
Share to Reproductive Health and Technologies

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 29897449
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dey118

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 1 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

ICSI does not increase the cumulative live birth rate in non-male factor infertilityPMID 29897449Read ↗

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection versus conventional in vitro insemination in couples with non-male infertility factor in the ‘real-world’ setting: analysis of the HFEA registrySemantic proximity Read ↗

Cumulative live-birth rates after assisted reproductive technologySemantic proximity Read ↗

Cumulative live birth rates following blastocyst- versus cleavage-stage embryo transfer in the first complete cycle of IVF: a population-based retrospective cohort studySemantic proximity Read ↗

Cumulative live birth rates according to the number of oocytes retrieved after the first ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a multicenter multinational analysis including ∼15,000 womenSemantic proximity Read ↗

ICSI does not improve reproductive outcomes in autologous ovarian response cycles with non-male factor subfertilitySemantic proximity Read ↗

Cumulative Live-Birth Rates after In Vitro FertilizationSemantic proximity Read ↗

Cumulative live birth rates in in-vitro fertilizationSemantic proximity Read ↗

Cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate achieved with oocyte vitrification and cleavage stage transfer without embryo selection in a standard infertility programSemantic proximity Read ↗

Cumulative live birth rate after IVF: trend over time and the impact of blastocyst culture and vitrificationSemantic proximity Read ↗

Secondary sex ratio in assisted reproduction: an analysis of 1 376 454 treatment cycles performed in the UKSemantic proximity Read ↗

Two-year cumulative live-birth rates and maximum number of transfer cycles in women aged >40 yearsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Cumulative live birth rate prognosis based on the number of aspirated oocytes in previous ART cyclesSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.