Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

[Impacts of microsatellite status, RAS and BRAF mutation on postoperative follow-up strategy in stage II( and III( colorectal cancer].

Zhonghua wei chang wai ke za zhi = Chinese journal of gastrointestinal surgery - 25 Jun 2018

Zhang Jing, Wang Xicheng, Shen Lin

Abstract excerpt

Colorectal cancer is the third tumor in the world, and nearly half of the stage II( and III( patients undergoing radical resection develop relapse. At present, the survival benefit of follow-up strategy is still unclear, partly due to the neglect of the risk of recurrence and the factors affecting prognosis. Studies found that microsatellite status, BRAF and RAS genotype had certain value for prognosis of...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Colorectal Neoplasms
Share to Follow-Up Studies

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Microsatellite Instability

Share to Microsatellite Repeats

Share to Neoplasm Recurrence, Local

Share to Neoplasm Staging

Share to Prognosis

Share to Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 29968248

Genes

BRAF

Variants

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 6 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

[Impacts of microsatellite status, RAS and BRAF mutation on postoperative follow-up strategy in stage II( and III( colorectal cancer].PMID 29968248Read ↗

Molecular profiling of risk factors for relapse in Japanese patients with stage II colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Survival after Curative Resection for Stage I Colorectal Mucinous AdenocarcinomaSemantic proximity Read ↗

A New Surveillance Algorithm After Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases Based on Changes in Recurrence Risk and RAS Mutation Status.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of patients according to recurrence time after curative resection for colorectal cancer.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The Survival Impact of Fluoropyrimidine Metronomic Maintenance Therapy Following Adjuvant Oxaliplatin-based Chemotherapy in Patients with Stage III Colorectal Cancer after Radical Resection: Functional Roles of EGFR as a Potential PredictorSemantic proximity Read ↗

Using ctDNA to Predict Recurrence After Surgery in Stage II–III Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Narrative Meta-AnalysisSemantic proximity Read ↗

The Effect of RAS/BRAF Mutation Status on Prognosis and Relapse Pattern in Early Stage Colon CancersSemantic proximity Read ↗

Investigation of correlation between mutational status in key EGFR signaling genes and prognosis of stage II colorectal cancer.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Survival Outcomes of Resected BRAF V600E Mutant Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study in Japan.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Prognostic assessment of resected colorectal liver metastases integrating pathological features, RAS mutation and Immunoscore.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The Effect of RAS/BRAF Mutation Status on Prognosis and Relapse Pattern in Early Stage Colon Cancers.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Prognostic Role of BRAF Mutation in Stage II/III Colorectal Cancer Receiving Curative Resection and Adjuvant Chemotherapy: A Meta-Analysis Based on Randomized Clinical Trials.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.