Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

ICSI does not improve reproductive outcomes in autologous ovarian response cycles with non-male factor subfertility

1 Mar 2020

Abstract excerpt

STUDY QUESTION: Does the method of fertilisation improve reproductive outcomes in poor ovarian response (POR) cycles when compared to all other ovarian response categories in the absence of male factor subfertility? SUMMARY ANSWER: ICSI does not confer any benefit in improving the clinical pregnancy or live birth (LB) outcome in autologous ovarian response cycles in the absence of male factor subfertility when...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Ovarian function and disorders
Share to Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Share to Reproductive Biology and Fertility

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 32161952
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dez301

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 5 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

ICSI does not improve reproductive outcomes in autologous ovarian response cycles with non-male factor subfertilityPMID 32161952Read ↗

Comparison of ICSI and Conventional IVF in Non-Male Factor Patients with Less Than Four OocytesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection versus conventional in vitro insemination in couples with non-male infertility factor in the ‘real-world’ setting: analysis of the HFEA registrySemantic proximity Read ↗

Male factor infertility and assisted reproductive technologies: indications, minimum access criteria and outcomesSemantic proximity Read ↗

To ICSI or Not to ICSISemantic proximity Read ↗

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection is not superior to conventional IVF in couples with non-male factor infertility and preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A)Semantic proximity Read ↗

Secondary sex ratio in assisted reproduction: an analysis of 1 376 454 treatment cycles performed in the UKSemantic proximity Read ↗

ICSI does not increase the cumulative live birth rate in non-male factor infertilitySemantic proximity Read ↗

Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Indications: How Rigorous?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Use of ICSI in IVF cycles in women with tubal ligation does not improve pregnancy or live birth ratesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Definition and causes of infertilitySemantic proximity Read ↗

Guideline for unexplained couple infertility: misunderstandings on the approach to the male factorSemantic proximity Read ↗

Donor IUI is equally effective for heterosexual couples, single women and lesbians, but autologous IUI does worseSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.