Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Dietary fat sources affect feed intake, digestibility, rumen microbial populations, energy partition and methane emissions in different beef cattle genotypes.

Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience - 1 Dec 2018

Kaewpila C, Sommart K, Mitsumori M

Abstract excerpt

The mitigation of enteric methane emission in beef cattle production is important for reducing feed energy loss and increasing environmental sustainability. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of different oilseeds included in fermented total mixed rations (whole soyabean seed (SBS, control), whole kapok seed (KPS) and cracked oil palm fruit (OPF)) on feed intake, digestibility, rumen...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Animal Feed
Share to Dietary Fats

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Dietary Supplements

Share to Digestion

Share to Energy Intake

Share to Methane

Share to Plant Oils

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 29557319
DOI: 10.1017/S1751731118000587

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-07.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Dietary fat sources affect feed intake, digestibility, rumen microbial populations, energy partition and methane emissions in different beef cattle genotypes.PMID 29557319Read ↗

Review: Biological determinants of between-animal variation in feed efficiency of growing beef cattle.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Influence of feeding system (concentrate and total mixed ration) on fatty acid profiles of beef from three lean cattle breedsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Transcriptional response to an alternative diet on liver, muscle, and rumen of beef cattle.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Analysis of the gut bacterial communities in beef cattle and their association with feed intake, growth, and efficiency.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic insights into enteric methane emissions in indoor-fed growing cattle.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Stool and ruminal microbiome components associated with methane emission and feed efficiency in Nelore beef cattle.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Phenotypic and genetic relationships of residual feed intake measures and their component traits with fatty acid composition in subcutaneous adipose of beef cattle.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Factors affecting recording methane emission phenotypes of composite and crossbreed beef cattle grazing tropical and subtropical rangelands of Northern Australia.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Fecal and Ruminal Microbiome Components Associated With Methane Emission in Beef Cattle.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Reducing GHG emissions through genetic improvement for feed efficiency: effects on economically important traits and enteric methane production.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Feeding hempseed cake alters the bovine gut, respiratory and reproductive microbiotaSemantic proximity Read ↗

Hydrogen and methane emissions from beef cattle and their rumen microbial community vary with diet, time after feeding and genotype.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.