Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Detection of evaluation bias caused by genomic preselection.

Journal of dairy science - 1 Apr 2018

Tyrisevä A-M, Mäntysaari E A, Jakobsen J, Aamand G P, Dürr J, Fikse W F, Lidauer M H

Abstract excerpt

The aim of this simulation study was to investigate whether it is possible to detect the effect of genomic preselection on Mendelian sampling (MS) means or variances obtained by the MS validation test. Genomic preselection of bull calves is 1 additional potential source of bias in international evaluations unless adequately accounted for in national evaluations. Selection creates no bias in traditional breeding...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Breeding
Share to Cattle
Share to Genetic Variation

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy Delete account & data About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Genome

Share to Models, Genetic

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 29397162
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2017-13527

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-08.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence. Graph snapshot: 2026-09-29.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Detection of evaluation bias caused by genomic preselection.PMID 29397162Read ↗

Investigating the impact of preselection on subsequent single-step genomic BLUP evaluation of preselected animals.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Avoiding preselection bias in subsequent single-step genomic BLUP evaluations of genomically preselected animals.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Impact of genomic preselection on subsequent genetic evaluations with ssGBLUP using real data from pigs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The effect of using cow genomic information on accuracy and bias of genomic breeding values in a simulated Holstein dairy cattle population.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of different validation methods for single-step genomic evaluations based on a simulated cattle population.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic selection in dairy cattle simulated populations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Validation of consistency of Mendelian sampling variance.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Technical note: adjustment of all cow evaluations for yield traits to be comparable with bull evaluations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Optimal strategies for the use of genomic selection in dairy cattle breeding programs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Allele frequency changes due to hitch-hiking in genomic selection programs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Reducing bias in the dairy cattle single-step genomic evaluation by ignoring bulls without progeny.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The impact of selective genotyping on the response to selection using single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.