Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Validation of consistency of Mendelian sampling variance.

Journal of dairy science - 1 Mar 2018

Tyrisevä A-M, Fikse W F, Mäntysaari E A, Jakobsen J, Aamand G P, Dürr J, Lidauer M H

Abstract excerpt

Experiences from international sire evaluation indicate that the multiple-trait across-country evaluation method is sensitive to changes in genetic variance over time. Top bulls from birth year classes with inflated genetic variance will benefit, hampering reliable ranking of bulls. However, none of the methods available today enable countries to validate their national evaluation models for heterogeneity of...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Breeding
Share to Cattle
Share to Genetic Variation

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Linear Models

Share to Models, Genetic

Share to Population Density

Share to Reproducibility of Results

Share to Sensitivity and Specificity

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 29290441
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2017-13255

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 6 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-06.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 6 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Validation of consistency of Mendelian sampling variance.PMID 29290441Read ↗

Invited review: A quarter of a century-International genetic evaluation of dairy sires using MACE methodology.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of performance records and national breeding values as input into international genetic evaluation.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Detection of evaluation bias caused by genomic preselection.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Updating the reference population to achieve constant genomic prediction reliability across generations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Technical note: adjustment of all cow evaluations for yield traits to be comparable with bull evaluations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Validation with single-step SNPBLUP shows that evaluations can continue using a single mean of genotyped individuals, even with multiple breeds.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Standard error of the genetic correlation: how much data do we need to estimate a purebred-crossbred genetic correlation?Semantic proximity Read ↗

International genomic evaluation methods for dairy cattle.Semantic proximity Read ↗

How pedigree errors affect genetic evaluations and validation statistics.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic evaluations for mixed-breed populations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Data subsetting strategies for estimation of across-country genetic correlations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Effect of genomic selection and genotyping strategy on estimation of variance components in animal models using different relationship matrices.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.