Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Statistical method to compare massive parallel sequencing pipelines.

BMC bioinformatics - 1 Mar 2017

Elsensohn M H, Leblay N, Dimassi S, Campan-Fournier A, Labalme A, Roucher-Boulez F, Sanlaville D, Lesca G, Bardel C, Roy P

Abstract excerpt

BACKGROUND: Today, sequencing is frequently carried out by Massive Parallel Sequencing (MPS) that cuts drastically sequencing time and expenses. Nevertheless, Sanger sequencing remains the main validation method to confirm the presence of variants. The analysis of MPS data involves the development of several bioinformatic tools, academic or commercial. We present here a statistical method to compare MPS pipelines...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Computational Biology
Share to Epilepsy

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing

Share to INDEL Mutation

Share to Models, Statistical

Share to Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Share to Sequence Analysis, DNA

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 28249565
DOI: 10.1186/s12859-017-1552-9
PMCID: PMC5333416

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 5 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-05.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 5 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Statistical method to compare massive parallel sequencing pipelines.PMID 28249565Read ↗

Beta-Binomial Model for the Detection of Rare Mutations in Pooled Next-Generation Sequencing Experiments.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Benchmarking whole exome sequencing pipeline for predicting pathogenic variants of significanceSemantic proximity Read ↗

Variant calling pipelines for whole exome sequencing in clinical contextSemantic proximity Read ↗

Identification of missing variants by combining multiple analytic pipelines.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Systematic comparison of variant calling pipelines using gold standard personal exome variants.Semantic proximity Read ↗

From Wet-Lab to Variations: Concordance and Speed of Bioinformatics Pipelines for Whole Genome and Whole Exome Sequencing.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of calling pipelines for whole genome sequencing: an empirical study demonstrating the importance of mapping and alignment.Semantic proximity Read ↗

AmpSeqR: an R package for amplicon deep sequencing data analysisSemantic proximity Read ↗

AmpSeqR: an R package for amplicon deep sequencing data analysisSemantic proximity Read ↗

Set-theory based benchmarking of three different variant callers for targeted sequencing.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Challenges in exome analysis by LifeScope and its alternative computational pipelines.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Customisation of the exome data analysis pipeline using a combinatorial approach.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.