Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Double vitrification and warming does not compromise the chance of live birth after single unbiopsied blastocyst transfer

1 Jan 2023

Abstract excerpt

STUDY QUESTION: Does double vitrification and thawing of an embryo compromise the chance of live birth after a single blastocyst transfer? SUMMARY ANSWER: The live birth rate (LBR) obtained after double vitrification was comparable to that obtained after single vitrification. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Double vitrification-warming (DVW) is commonly practiced to accommodate surplus viable embryos suitable for...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Ovarian function and disorders
Share to Reproductive Biology and Fertility
Share to Reproductive Health and Technologies

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 37840636
DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoad037

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Double vitrification and warming does not compromise the chance of live birth after single unbiopsied blastocyst transferPMID 37840636Read ↗

Twice vitrification-warming procedures has no effect on frozen-thawed embryo transfer outcomesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Double versus single blastocyst biopsy and vitrification in PGT cycles: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and neonatal outcomes.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Shortened blastocyst vitrification achieves live birth rates comparable to standard protocols: an analysis of 3168 cryotransfersSemantic proximity Read ↗

Double vitrification and warming of blastocysts does not affect pregnancy, miscarriage or live birth ratesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Cumulative live birth rates after fresh and vitrified cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer in the first treatment cycleSemantic proximity Read ↗

Associations of blastocyst features, trophectoderm biopsy and other laboratory practice with post-warming behavior and implantationSemantic proximity Read ↗

Women may not benefit from repeated frozen embryo transfers: a retrospective analysis of the cumulative live birth rate of 43 972 womenSemantic proximity Read ↗

Outcome of closed blastocyst vitrification in relation to blastocyst quality: evaluation of 759 warming cycles in a single-embryo transfer policySemantic proximity Read ↗

Live Birth Resulting from the Direct Warming and Direct Rehydration of Vitrified Human Blastocyst in Embryo Culture Medium: A Pilot StudySemantic proximity Read ↗

Cumulative live birth rate after IVF: trend over time and the impact of blastocyst culture and vitrificationSemantic proximity Read ↗

Fast and furious: live birth outcomes in 1266 infants born after one-step warming of vitrified human blastocystsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Age-related increase in live-birth rates of first frozen thaw embryo versus first fresh transfer in initial assisted reproductive technology cycles without PGTSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.