Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Primary care professionals' perceptions of using a short family history questionnaire.

Family practice - 1 Dec 2016

Ahmed Shenaz, Hayward Judith, Ahmed Mushtaq

Abstract excerpt

BACKGROUND: Improving access for relatives at-risk of genetic conditions by building referral systems from primary care to genetic services is well recognised. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to explore primary care professionals' (PCPs) views about using a short, seven-item family history questionnaire (S-FHQ) as an intervention for identifying at-risk relatives of patients with a genetic condition in routine...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Attitude of Health Personnel
Share to Ethics, Medical
Share to Focus Groups

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Medical History Taking

Share to Perception

Share to Primary Health Care

Share to Qualitative Research

Share to Referral and Consultation

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 27535332
DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmw080

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-07.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Primary care professionals' perceptions of using a short family history questionnaire.PMID 27535332Read ↗

General practitioners' attitudes to assessment of genetic risk of common disorders in routine primary care.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Adaptation and pilot implementation of a hereditary cancer risk-assessment tool for primary care.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic consultations in primary care: GPs' responses to three scenarios.Semantic proximity Read ↗

General practitioners’ views on genomics, practice and education: A qualitative interview studySemantic proximity Read ↗

Patients' perspectives regarding health professionals contacting their relatives about genetic risk directly (with patient consent).Semantic proximity Read ↗

Addressing healthcare practitioner genetic knowledge, attitude and practices in Gauteng Province, South AfricaSemantic proximity Read ↗

Health professionals contacting patients' relatives directly about genetic risk (with patient consent): current clinical practice and perspectives.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluation of DNA-poli: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial to assess a digital platform for family cascade genetic testing and predictive genetic counsellingSemantic proximity Read ↗

A randomized controlled trial to assess the psychological impact of a family history screening questionnaire in general practice.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Addressing healthcare practitioner genetic knowledge, attitude and practices in Gauteng, South Africa – preparation for an educational interventionSemantic proximity Read ↗

Direct notification by health professionals of relatives at-risk of genetic conditions (with patient consent): views of the Australian publicSemantic proximity Read ↗

Family history in primary care: understanding GPs' resistance to clinical genetics--qualitative study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.