Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Pre-implantation genetic testing in ART: who will benefit and what is the evidence?

5 Aug 2016

Abstract excerpt

Pre-implantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy testing (PGD-A) is a tool to identify euploid embryos during IVF. The suggested populations of patients that can benefit from it are infertile women of advanced maternal age, with a history of recurrent miscarriages and/or IVF failures. However, a general consensus has not yet been reached.After the clinical failure of its first version based on cleavage stage...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
Share to Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Share to Reproductive Biology and Fertility

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 27491771
DOI: 10.1007/s10815-016-0785-2

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Pre-implantation genetic testing in ART: who will benefit and what is the evidence?PMID 27491771Read ↗

Preimplantation Genetic Testing for AneuploidySemantic proximity Read ↗

Should pre-implantation genetic screening be implemented to routine clinical practice?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT‐A): The biology, the technology and the clinical outcomesSemantic proximity Read ↗

PGT‐A preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies and embryo selection in routine ART cycles: Time to step back?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Accuracy of Non-Invasive Preimplantation Genetic Testing (niPGT) Compared to Invasive Embryo BiopsySemantic proximity Read ↗

Noninvasive Preimplantation Genetic Testing in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss and Implantation Failure: Breakthrough or Overpromise?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) and genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A): status and future challengesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Preimplantation genetic testing in assisted reproductionSemantic proximity Read ↗

We have reached a dead end for preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidySemantic proximity Read ↗

Clinical application of embryo aneuploidy testing by next-generation sequencingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: is the promise real?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Pre‐implantation genetic testing: Past, present, futureSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.