Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Is There a Right Time to Know?: The Right Not to Know and Genetic Testing in Children

1 Jan 2014

Abstract excerpt

The increasing implementation of next-generation sequencing technologies in the clinical context and the expanding commercial offer of genetic tests directly-toconsumers has increased the availability of previously inaccessible genetic information. A particular concern in both situations is how the volume of novel information will affect the processing of genetic and genomic information from minors. For minors,...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to BRCA gene mutations in cancer
Share to Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
Share to Genomics and Rare Diseases

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 26767473
DOI: 10.1111/jlme.12115

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Is There a Right Time to Know?: The Right Not to Know and Genetic Testing in ChildrenPMID 26767473Read ↗

Predictive genetic testing in minors for adult‐onset genetic diseasesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic Testing for Children and AdolescentsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Adolescents’ preferences regarding disclosure of incidental findings in genomic sequencing that are not medically actionable in childhoodSemantic proximity Read ↗

Predictive genetic testing for adult‐onset disorders in minors: a critical analysis of the arguments for and against the 2013 ACMG guidelinesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Prenatal Testing for Adult‐Onset Conditions: the Position of the National Society of Genetic CounselorsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Commentary on predictive genetic testing of minors: by Mand et al.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Predictive genetic testing in children.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Professionally Responsible Disclosure of Genomic Sequencing Results in Pediatric PracticeSemantic proximity Read ↗

Whether, when, and how to communicate genetic risk to minors: ‘I wanted more information but I think they were scared I couldn’t handle it’Semantic proximity Read ↗

Predictive genetic testing in young people for adult-onset conditions: where is the empirical evidence?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Predictive genetic testing in minors for late-onset conditions: a chronological and analytical review of the ethical arguments.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Resolving the impasse on predictive genetic testing in minors: will more evidence be the solution?Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.