Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Microbial community analysis and identification of alternative host-specific fecal indicators in fecal and river water samples using pyrosequencing.

Journal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea) - 1 Aug 2011

Jeong Ju-Yong, Park Hee-Deung, Lee Kyong-Hee, Weon Hang-Yeon, Ka Jong-Ok

Abstract excerpt

It is important to know the comprehensive microbial communities of fecal pollution sources and receiving water bodies for microbial source tracking. Pyrosequencing targeting the V1-V3 hypervariable regions of the 16S rRNA gene was used to investigate the characteristics of bacterial and Bacteroidales communities in major fecal sources and river waters. Diversity analysis indicated that cow feces had the highest...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Bacteroidetes
Share to Cattle

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy Delete account & data About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to DNA, Bacterial

Share to Rivers

Share to RNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Share to Sequence Analysis, DNA

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 21887641
DOI: 10.1007/s12275-011-0530-6

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-08.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence. Graph snapshot: 2026-09-29.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Microbial community analysis and identification of alternative host-specific fecal indicators in fecal and river water samples using pyrosequencing.PMID 21887641Read ↗

Metagenome-based comparisons of decay rates and host-specificity of fecal microbial communities for improved microbial source trackingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Analysis of human and animal fecal microbiota for microbial source trackingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of Sewage and Animal Fecal Microbiomes by Using Oligotyping Reveals Potential Human Fecal Indicators in Multiple Taxonomic GroupsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Microbial diversity in freshwater samples and their contaminating human and bovine hostsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of the Performance of Different Microbial Source Tracking Markers among European and North African RegionsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Estimation of Pig Fecal Contamination in a River Catchment by Real-Time PCR Using Two Pig-Specific Bacteroidales 16S rRNA Genetic MarkersSemantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluation of two library-independent microbial source tracking methods to identify sources of fecal contamination in French estuaries.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A high-throughput and quantitative hierarchical oligonucleotide primer extension (HOPE)-based approach to identify sources of faecal contamination in water bodies.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparative Analysis of Fecal Microbiomes From Wild Waterbirds to Poultry, Cattle, Pigs, and Wastewater Treatment Plants for a Microbial Source Tracking ApproachSemantic proximity Read ↗

Identification of host-specific Bacteroidales 16S rDNA sequences from human sewage and ruminant feces.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Host Distributions of Uncultivated Fecal <i>Bacteroidales</i> Bacteria Reveal Genetic Markers for Fecal Source IdentificationSemantic proximity Read ↗

Next-generation sequencing identification of pathogenic bacterial genes and their relationship with fecal indicator bacteria in different water sources in the Kathmandu Valley, NepalSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.