Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Effects of genetic and environmental risk assessment feedback on colorectal cancer screening adherence.

Journal of behavioral medicine - 1 Oct 2015

Myers Ronald E, Ruth Karen, Manne Sharon L, Cocroft James, Sifri Randa, Ziring Barry, Burgh Desiree, Ross Eric, Weinberg David S

Abstract excerpt

Little is known about the impact of genetic and environmental risk assessment (GERA) feedback on colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. In a recently completed randomized trial, primary care patients received GERA feedback based on a blood test for genetic polymorphisms and serum folate level (GERA Group) versus usual care (Control Group). Subsequently, participants were offered CRC screening. Among participants who...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Aged
Share to Colorectal Neoplasms

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Early Detection of Cancer

Share to Mass Screening

Share to Patient Compliance

Share to Primary Health Care

Share to Risk Assessment

Share to White People

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 25783675
DOI: 10.1007/s10865-015-9626-5

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-07.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Effects of genetic and environmental risk assessment feedback on colorectal cancer screening adherence.PMID 25783675Read ↗

Genetic and environmental risk assessment and colorectal cancer screening in an average-risk population: a randomized trial.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Behavioral and psychosocial responses to genomic testing for colorectal cancer risk.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The efficacy of genetic counseling for familial colorectal cancer: A meta‐analysisSemantic proximity Read ↗

A Review of African Americans’ Beliefs and Attitudes About Genomic Studies: Opportunities for Message DesignSemantic proximity Read ↗

Incorporating genetic susceptibility feedback into a smoking cessation program for African-American smokers with low income.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluation of a brief web-based genetic feedback intervention for reducing alcohol-related health risks associated with ALDH2.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Effects of racial and ethnic group and health literacy on responses to genomic risk information in a medically underserved population.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Individual- and provider-level factors associated with colorectal cancer screening in accordance with guideline recommendation: a community-level perspective across varying levels of risk.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Communication strategies for enhancing understanding of the behavioral implications of genetic and biomarker tests for disease risk: the role of coherence.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A randomized trial to increase colonoscopy screening in members of high-risk families in the colorectal cancer family registry and cancer genetics network.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Using a family history intervention to improve cancer risk perception in a black community.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A randomized trial Examining The Impact Of Communicating Genetic And Lifestyle Risks For Obesity.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.